[QUOTE=Glottis-3D;548127]Even with clear danger of XP whoring, we cannot argue that Top player Is better than the Bottom player.
I cannot remember any game, where a bottom player could be considered as MVP of the match.
That is more than enough for statistic altering of the rank bonuses.
So as i see this:
Glottis with 2000 ELO Won and placed 1st in his “Team B” (Everage team ELO 2000) in a match Against “Team A” with Average team elo 2000,
Szakalot with 2200 ELO from “Team B” placed last in the same match.
Glottis gets +50 w/l elo and +20% from score placement = +60 elo
Szaka gets +40(because he is higher in rank than :Team A" thus less default delta-elo) w/l elo and -20% from score placement = +32 elo
so after this match
Glottis 2060 ELO (MVP of the match, and applause from teamspeak)
Szakalot 2232 ELO (Says something about still being better than Glottis, lets go 1on1 fletcha vs proxy, what the matter, scared, haa??)
:>
am i right in my calculations?[/QUOTE]
disagree, the base elo adjustment should be the same for both you and me. Just because I am individually higher doesn’t mean that I didn’t have to try just as hard to compensate for that other unnamed 1800 elo player.
So both of us get +50 win base, that later gets boosted to 60 for you, and 40 for me